ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists

1998-02-12 16:55:09
from [Black Unicorn] [Permanent Link] 
At 06:52 PM 2/12/98 GMT, Adam Back wrote:


I noticed as a result of Lutz quoting a section from his OpenPGP
formal spec to cypherpunks that it still refers to ROT-13 (he refers
to ROT-N).

I that the inclusion of ROT-N was a joke on the part of Jon Callas,
and that it had been removed from the draft.

I would suggest in the interests of security that it be removed from
the formal spec also.


I was under the impression it was left in for debugging?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, Werner Koch
Next by Date:  Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, David Formosa
Previous by Thread:  Re: non-standard CFB (Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists), Jon Callas
Next by Thread:  Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, Lutz Donnerhacke
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]