-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Adam Back wrote:
I that the inclusion of ROT-N was a joke on the part of Jon Callas,
and that it had been removed from the draft.
I beleave that as ROT-N has the property of being able to calculated in
side a persons head it should be retained for debugging.
I would suggest in the interests of security that it be removed from
the formal spec also.
As ROT-N is a MAY requiremnt, just an entery on a table I do not beleave
that it would reduce security. If you are afread that it would be used in
production code perhaps we should inculde a warning in the RFC about
its use.
- --
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNOOxA6QK0ynCmdStAQFnrAQAyhMp7L/dPhEn2iPU2sRF+jbFSoi7uo4S
JdeWANzwrw3RWmVY0ywFOWvcHmfbcHlcWOy85b9VfHgQ1dQmPYBMcAUddwsmIpjI
W1U65O1O1UuaIR26QnaqcqBq6y52dwZLaFetRyoETDCZsp78h6VOePz9a+p3mkDK
WtFNM7taep0=
=5wil
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----