Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists

ietf-openpgp

1998-02-13 01:25:39

* Black Unicorn wrote:

At 06:52 PM 2/12/98 GMT, Adam Back wrote:

I would suggest in the interests of security that it be removed from
the formal spec also.


I was under the impression it was left in for debugging?


So do I.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, Adam Back Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, Werner Koch non-standard CFB (Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists), Adam Back Re: non-standard CFB (Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists), Jon Callas Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, Black Unicorn Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, Lutz Donnerhacke <= Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, David Formosa

Previous by Date:	Re: Extension to packet lengths, Lutz Donnerhacke
Next by Date:	non-standard CFB (Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists), Adam Back
Previous by Thread:	Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, Black Unicorn
Next by Thread:	Re: Lutz formal spec / ROT-13 persists, David Formosa
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]