ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Modifications of 1991 necessary?

1998-02-19 12:19:09
At 06:58 AM 2/19/98 GMT, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:

This modification was not discussed and is not yet implemented in the
refernce implementation. I doubt it to be useful. Subkeys can use packet
version four and must not destroy existing standards in use.
   
I beg your pardon? I'm staring at the standard and it says in section 4.2:

  PGP 2.6.X only uses old format packets.  Thus, software that
  interoperates with those versions of PGP must only use old format
  packets.  If interoperability is not an issue, either format may be
  used.

Section 4.3 says:

  The packet tag denotes what type of packet the body holds.  Note that
  old format packets can only have tags less than 16, whereas new format
  packets can have tags as great as 63.  The defined tags (in decimal)
  are:

What do I need to add to make this more clear? It would certainly be a pity
if your reference implementation did not comply to the spec.

        Jon



-----
Jon Callas                                  jon(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com
CTO, Total Network Security                 4200 Bohannon Drive
Network Associates, Inc.                    Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 473-2860                              
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
              665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628           (RSA)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>