ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note)

1998-07-01 01:36:13
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <9807010643(_dot_)AA29576(_at_)watpub1(_dot_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>, on 
07/01/98 
   at 02:43 AM, Uri Blumenthal <uri(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> said:

Paul Lambert says:
So I doubt that open-pgp will be able to include ECC.

If open-pgp contains RSA why can't it contain ECC?

Because today it is possible to have a free and legal
implementation of RSA. But it is not possible to have
a free and legal implementation of ECC. 

No, no it's not. RSADSI charges $20,000 to use their algorithms in any
program other than freeware along with some other rather unacceptable
conditions to it's use.

IMHO the only reason RSA is still in the spec is due to the large user
base of 2.6.x users.

The IETF is moving away from the use of encumbered algorithms and I see no
reason why we should reverse the trend here.

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgp.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Tag-O-Matic: How do you spell relief? OS/2!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBNZn35o9Co1n+aLhhAQE1ywP9HoBw7ZPuE1QtvlmAGW+uWHiiubfAN6BE
fqmLo9RossqOG4iT+uq7hJbWaEwsW7BmLp+hPwsSLjZV3rb2zsxOdeGLSMrpvn49
DIY7jHwU4DtkYjuniT/ZBWDyNRa5YeOVPF0r/aqQ3C0p/zTJK4kdtKb+jpz6D3hb
cWXHTTURPRE=
=yXnr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----