Re: meeting in San Francisco?

ietf-openpgp

2003-03-07 11:33:40


On 3/7/03 5:45 AM, "Bodo Moeller" 
<moeller(_at_)cdc(_dot_)informatik(_dot_)tu-darmstadt(_dot_)de>
wrote:

No.  PGP is not just about encryption, there's also signatures (in
particular, certification signatures).


So we're no longer recommending against MD5? To my mind, MD5 is already a
reason not to use V3.

    Jon

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: meeting in San Francisco?, (continued) Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Jon Callas HKP (was Re: meeting in San Francisco?), David Shaw Deprecating old keys (was Re: meeting in San Francisco?), David Shaw Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Werner Koch Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Jon Callas Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Len Sassaman Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Derek Atkins Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Len Sassaman Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Adam Back Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Bodo Moeller Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Jon Callas <= Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Bodo Moeller Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Len Sassaman v4-only keyanalyze (was Re: meeting in San Francisco?), Jason Harris Re: v4-only keyanalyze, Werner Koch Re: v4-only keyanalyze, Jon Callas Re: v4-only keyanalyze, Bodo Moeller Further deprecating PGP2 (was: Re: meeting in San Francisco?), Michael Young Re: Further deprecating PGP2, Werner Koch

Previous by Date:	Re: Dash-escaping clarification, Jon Callas
Next by Date:	Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Len Sassaman
Previous by Thread:	Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Bodo Moeller
Next by Thread:	Re: meeting in San Francisco?, Bodo Moeller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]