Re: Adding GOST as a cipher?

* Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
> * Ian G wrote:
> > It would however be a nuisance if it was "rushed in" only to find out
> > later that it is ... not quite right.  I gather there are rather a lot of
> > options behind the simple 'GOST' word?  Is this the algorithm where the
> > S-Boxes aren't specified in the standard?
> Exactly. GOST is assumed to be more vulnerable than DES.
It seems to be changed in the past. I try to get the standards in order to
quickly evaluate the usefulness.