Hi,
I strongly agree with this. Compression is a very useful safety belt
making statistical cryptanalysis substantially harder even if the used
cipher begins showing weakness.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 3/20/19 3:53 PM, Andre Heinecke wrote:
Hi,
Vincent said that my mail was too rambling. I agree. Here is the short
Version:
* Compression is good and necessary.
* Standardized compression is good.
* I don't want to use unstandardized compression only because you do not want
to implement compression in sequoia.
* There is no reason the change the standard. Compression has been around for
ages. It is _standard_ and working well.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp