Derek,
However, technically, Werner has the right to do as he pleases because, as
I've said before, there is no working group. Also, technically, anyone else
could take up the reigns and create an alternative 4880bis.
I don't understand how any other course of action besides "it's closed,
therefore we can't publish under that namespace" could be valid here. Apparently
we are going with "it's closed, therefore anyone can publish whatever they want,
even if their integrity as an editor has been actively contested".
If you want to talk about working group consensus, THAT is definitely NOT
a place where WG Consensus can or should happen.
Agreed. I only brought it up as informative.
IMHO, that conversation should have been had on this list prior to the
draft being updated.
Also agreed. But it didn't. Perhaps we should think about why that is, and work
towards changing it.
- V
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp