Your position here is really vague.
Is iCAP (in your opinion) a Network Appliance owned object that you hope
a standards group to approve (whatever Network Appliance
is offering) or is iCAP an industry consensus
item with multiple implementations?
The organization of submission is not important, although having submitted
it to one usually defines a position with regard to the "industry
consensus" aspect.
At 06:33 PM 6/14/2001 +0200, you wrote:
At 08:23 AM 14/06/01 -0700, Ian Cooper wrote:
At 16:04 6/13/2001 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
But that doesn't answer my question. Are you planning on submitting
draft-elson-opes-icap-01.txt to the RFC editor as a representation of
the iCAP protocol?
From real world discussions at the workshop last week and elsewhere I'd
say the answer is a (very big) "no".
That was *always* our intention. I thought I had made this clear in my
initial email? - if not, I apologize for causing confusion.
John
---------------------------------------------------------------
Network Appliance Direct / Voicemail: +31 23 567 9615
Scorpius 2 Fax: +31 23 567 9699
NL-2132 LR Hoofddorp Main Office: +31 23 567 9600
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael W. Condry
Director, Network Edge Technology