RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements
2001-11-29 21:59:26
-----Original Message-----
From: Maciocco, Christian
[mailto:christian(_dot_)maciocco(_at_)intel(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:22 PM
To: 'Ian Cooper'; ietf-openproxy(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Cc: Phil Rzewski; Penno, Reinaldo [SC9:T327:EXCH]
Subject: RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements
I agree with Ian. An OPES service needs to be explicitely
requested and must
not brake the end-to-end connection. The place to do this is
on proxies the
client connects to, where the connections are terminated.
I don't see OPES services working out of an L3 sniffer kind of device.
Right, but that doesn't mean some vendor will not do it. OPES is a logical
entity, it can run in an appliance or in a router. It can run in a
edge/access router (or even in a DSL Router in somebody's home) and still
meet all the requirements.
regards,
-RP
Christian
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Cooper [mailto:ian(_at_)the-coopers(_dot_)org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:22 AM
To: ietf-openproxy(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Cc: Phil Rzewski; Reinaldo Penno
Subject: RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements
OK, it looks like the confusion here goes back to assumptions
of what the
phrase "IP connectivity" means - something I decided to not
comment on
earlier.
The point seems to be that you either have a content
network in place
before you overlay an OPES environment on it, or that you
install a content
network by installing an OPES environment box or boxes (the
confusion here
can probably summarized as "what is OPES?"). In the latter
case, so far as
you "only need IP connectivity" to do this, you're pretty
much right. But
I don't think you can have OPES services without having some
application
layer intermediary/host on which to run them. For example,
my initial take
on the "only need IP connectivity" point suggested you might
be thinking of
putting OPES services in something like a (L3) router...
which is a big
no-no.
--On Tuesday, November 27, 2001 16:26 -0800 Phil Rzewski
<philr(_at_)inktomi(_dot_)com> wrote:
At 03:22 PM 11/27/2001 -0800, Reinaldo Penno wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Rzewski
[<mailto:philr(_at_)inktomi(_dot_)com>mailto:philr(_at_)inktomi(_dot_)com]
Sent: Monday,
November 26, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Penno, Reinaldo [SC9:T327:EXCH]
Cc: ietf-openproxy(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements
<snip>
In brief, we know that in the routed world, once you put two
host machines on
the same ethernet wire, you technically have a "network". As
"networks" go,
it's on a whole different scale than one operated by AT&T or
the IT department
at your local enterprise, but this is why we have terms like
"public backbone
network", "LAN", "VPN", etc. Similarly, we would argue that
once you add ANY
proxy ("forward" or "reverse") you have created a type of
Content Network.
okay, I can agree with that since it actually adds to my
point that to
have OPES you only need
IP connectivity, nothing else. You do not need an CN (and
not by a long
shot a CDN) overlay network in place BEFORE you install
OPES devices.
I'm not sure how you get that from what I said, though
maybe I'm failing
to understand something. Back when I was first tracking OPES, the
services were assumed to be provided by either proxylets or
callouts to
external boxes. The device that was making those callouts
or calling
those proxylets was typically described as being a
surrogate or proxy of
some kind. If that's still true (is it not?), then by my
definition, you
WOULD have a Content Network before you layer OPES
proxylets/callouts on
top of it.
You end up having a CN (not an CDN) overlay network AFTER
you install an
OPES
device.
This I'd agree with, but I'm agreeing with the literal
statement. :)
That is, I'd say that any network that contains OPES services is a
Content Network (I think it had to be before you added the
OPES services,
even). It may be a CDN, since a CDN is just a specific type
of Content
Network. That's determined by whether it contains components like
distribution, request routing, etc.
--
Phil Rzewski - Senior Architect - Inktomi Corporation
650-653-2487 (office) - 650-303-3790 (cell) - 650-653-1848 (fax)
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, (continued)
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Phil Rzewski
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Reinaldo Penno
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Phil Rzewski
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Tomlinson, Gary
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Reinaldo Penno
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Tomlinson, Gary
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Reinaldo Penno
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Tomlinson, Gary
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Maciocco, Christian
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements,
Reinaldo Penno <=
- RE: Draft on Callout Protocol Requirements, Reinaldo Penno
|
|
|