ietf-openproxy
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: AW: Using XML in OCP transport

2003-05-07 16:14:43

At 22:52 07/05/03, Markus Hofmann wrote:
Please note that I am not casting my vote here, just documenting and clarifying available options:
        - "polish" ICAP (e.g., document encryption) [ call it ICAP/1.1? ]
        - write OCP on top of TCP [ call it ICAP/2.0? ]
        - write OCP on top of BEEP [ call it OCP/BEEP ]

Understood, it's appreciated! And we need to get closure on that one to move on. Anyone else a strong opinion?

I fully agree that these are the options. (except that I would also consider on top of IP). I suggest that now this is clear, I suppose, to everyone, we go a step further and try to quantify the resulting qualities (there are not con and pros, just how it will be) of each solutions for a decision grid.

The will permit to objectively list which applications best benefit from each approach, in which model context. I suppose IAB will ask that kind of documentation to support our choice?

If we see and document that several solutions are in real demand, I have nothing against an OPES family of protocols. As you know I think OPES are just the begining of a total revamp the Internet access concept into an internet (ONES) service concept.
jfc