MArkus,
new insights are comming as we speak.
but as I said I can live with the other options
abbie
-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Hofmann [mailto:markus(_at_)mhof(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 4:56 PM
To: OPES Group
Subject: Re: Strawman OPES Charter
Abbie Barbir wrote:
Just to make sure: which of the following you consider essential:
a) forget about P choice, start from scratch, write a
formal "language requirements" document, then select among
IRML, P, and possibly other candidates.
b) confirm past P choice, but write a "language requirements"
document or section, before proceeding with polishing P
c) confirm P choice, and do not write a "language
requirements" document/section
well, I go for option a) to be frank. However, I can live
with b) or
c) if the WG wants that.
Are there any new insights or developments that came up after our
earlier discussions we had on "P" and other approaches? If not, I
don't want to re-iterate the discussions we already had.
-Markus