Re: The RC2 debate

Paul E Hoffman <phoffman(_at_)imc(_dot_)org> wrote:
> I'd like to second the motion to split the RC2/40 discussion 
> into two parts. Please note the subject of this part, and 
> reply with this subject if you want to talk about whether or 
> not the S/MIME spec should have a MUST or a SHOULD that 
> includes RC2 encryption.
S/MIME MAY include RC2.
RC2 should not be a MUST.