Re: Signing time format

Don't you think that fifty years is enough time to upgrade all certificate
implenetations?

Russ

At 08:33 PM 9/17/97 EDT, Roger Fajman wrote:
> > PKIX says 2050.  I say we go with that.
> It makes sense to coordinate with PKIX, but why does PKIX say 2050?
> 2090 would make a lot more sense, as no certificates existed before
> 1990.  Or, perhaps the Year2000 WG will choose a common number for
> all Internet protocols.  In that case, something like 2060 might
> make sense.