Re: ESS-05 comments

All,

I still disagree with adding the ML exempted address feature to CMS or ESS.
This service does not belong in any security protocol.  If a user
organization needs this service then they can implement it without adding
unneeded complexity to the security protocol.

================================
John Pawling, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com                             
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.   
www.jgvandyke.com         
================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
ESS-05 comments, Capt Y. Theriault Re: ESS-05 comments, John Pawling Re: ESS-05 comments, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: ESS-05 comments, Elliott Ginsburg Re: ESS-05 comments, Sean Turner Re: ESS-05 comments - exempted addresses, Capt Y. Theriault Re: ESS-05 comments - MLA withdrawal of a signed receipt request., Capt Y. Theriault Re: ESS-05 comments, John Pawling <= Re: ESS-05 comments, Bonatti, Chris Re: ESS-05 comments, Elliott Ginsburg Re: ESS-05 comments, John Pawling

Previous by Date:	Re: ESS-05 comments, Elliott Ginsburg
Next by Date:	Re: Attribute Certificate(s) in S/MIME, John Pawling
Previous by Thread:	Re: ESS-05 comments - MLA withdrawal of a signed receipt request., Capt Y. Theriault
Next by Thread:	Re: ESS-05 comments, Bonatti, Chris
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]