Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-camellia-02.txt

I have four comments on draft-ietf-smime-camellia-02.txt.

1.  The reference to RFC 2119 does not belong in the Abstract.  It belongs 
in the Introduction.  Many documents place it in a subsection of the 
Introduction, called "Terminology"
2.  I propose an alternative Abstract:

    This document specifies the conventions for using the Camellia
    encryption algorithm for encryption with the Cryptographic
    Message Syntax (CMS).

3.  I propose an alternative for the first paragraph in the Introduction:

    This document specifies the conventions for using the Camellia
    encryption algorithm [CamelliaSpec][CamelliaID] for encryption with
    the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) [CMS].  The relevant object
    identifiers (OIDs) and processing steps are provided so that
    Camellia may be used in the CMS specification (RFC 3369, RFC 3370)
    for content and key encryption.

4.  The ASN.1 module needs a module identifier.  Please send email to 
ietf-smime-oid-reg(_at_)imc(_dot_)org if you want it assigned from the S/MIME WG arc.
Russ