Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4
2002-08-17 10:53:37
You most certainly are allowed to reject connections from
www.spammer.com.
You can reject the connection because the SMTP client's IP corresponds
to www.spammer.com. Perfectly legal by the RFC. The HELO/EHLO argument
never enters the picture.
--Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Kai Henningsen
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Gregory Neil Shapiro
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Keith Moore
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, John C Klensin
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, John C Klensin
|
|
|