Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4
2002-08-17 13:04:43
That's not sufficient. If you want that wording, you have to detail what
"postive" and "negative" mean.
You may also want to explain the implications, for example for SMTP
clients sitting behind NAT routers.
--Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, (continued)
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Gregory Neil Shapiro
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Keith Moore
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, John C Klensin
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, John C Klensin
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Keith Moore
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Eric A. Hall
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Keith Moore
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Matti Aarnio
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, John C Klensin
- Re: clarification re 2821, s4.1.4, Keith Moore
|
|
|