[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement-07.txt

2003-12-13 05:33:51

Personal opinion: I believe the document will have more impact if published separately from the revision to RFC 2821. I also believe that tying this to the revision of RFC 2821 would significantly delay a published specification for how to use SMTP in the IPv6 world.

On Dec 10, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:

        an updated version of draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
        is attached.

to ADs: it may not reflect all the coments i have received, but anyways
        better than nothing.  i think it should really be integrated into
        update to RFC2821 (instead of being standalone document).
it is still using "ngtrans" in the name, however, it is suggested that the document should be discussed in APP area (there's no email-related
        WG exist at this point).

        ADs: let me know how to proceed on this document.  should we propose
        changes to RFC2821, or?  tnx.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>