On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:03:53AM -0500,
Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:22:25 +0100, Keld =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Simonsen
said:
I presumed you were suggested for the RBL sites to include virus/spam
infected machines.
Yes, I was.
Oh great. So now in addition to my DHCP address being blocked because
some previous incumbent was a spammer, I can be blocked because the
previous owner of the address had a virus. (And you know *very* well that
some fool is going to "fix" their mail hub's virus scanner to automagically
feed reports into the RBL without human intervention).
A great step backward.
From what? There are already RBLs that blacklist dynamic IPs.
Not that I like it. Yes, there will most likely be machines that automatically
report infected machines.
Keld