Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records
2004-03-19 08:11:46
Lyndon Nerenberg writes:
But how does this handle the multiple-address case? Or even the
DHCP-based DSL user?
Once the email address has been typed, nice sensible defaults appear in
the rest of the dialog. The user may change settings at will, or just
click OK.
I guess I'm not disagreeing that SRV won't help, but in a practical
sense I'm not convinced it really solves much of a problem.
A few years ago I wrote a linux installer which generally supplied
correct network details. People hardly ever needed to type in their
netmask.
Was the need to type in a netmask a big problem? No way. Did people love
it when the problem went away? Yes they did.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, (continued)
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, John C Klensin
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, John C Klensin
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore
- Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Arnt Gulbrandsen
|
|
|