IETF SMTP (date)

IETF SMTP (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

March 31, 2004

Re: 551: Do MTAs try forward-path???, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:00
Re: 551: Do MTAs try forward-path???, James M Galvin, 07:00
551: Do MTAs try forward-path???, Martin R. Garcia, 05:33
I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Arun Sankar, 01:56

March 28, 2004

Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 20:12
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus Assmann, 18:46
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 16:08
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus Assmann, 14:07
MARID participation, Dave Crocker, 13:53
RE: deferred RCPT responses, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg), 13:38
Re: deferred RCPT responses, ned+ietf-smtp, 11:24
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus Färber, 10:10
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:20
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 07:34

March 27, 2004

Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus Assmann, 23:45
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Hector Santos, 23:35
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 18:27
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Hector Santos, 18:13
deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 16:28

March 26, 2004

Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Hector Santos, 20:06
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Hector Santos, 19:50
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:40
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:38
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, James M Galvin, 11:12
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 10:59
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, John C Klensin, 08:23
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:45
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Hector Santos, 07:45
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, bz, 07:26
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:43
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, bz, 06:01
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:34

March 25, 2004

RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 15:49
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:37
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Hector Santos, 12:35
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 12:25
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:19
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 11:52
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 10:50
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:32
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., bz, 07:01
Fw: Re: SPEWS: S1861 removal request, bz, 06:51

March 24, 2004

Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, wayne, 20:31
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:51
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:25

March 23, 2004

Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keith Moore, 21:33
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, kent crispin, 20:58
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, John C Klensin, 20:26
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keith Moore, 18:05
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., Daryl Odnert, 17:56
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., bz, 17:29
argh. wrong subject. Should have been Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., bz, 17:08
RE: Re: SPEWS: S1753 (The Motley Fool), Daryl Odnert, 17:03
Fw: Re: SPEWS: S1753 (The Motley Fool), bz, 16:39
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, John C Klensin, 16:38
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 16:09
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keith Moore, 15:53
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Dan Wing, 13:46
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, John C Klensin, 13:41
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:23
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Dan Wing, 10:43
Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, bz, 10:27

March 19, 2004

Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 13:37
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:11

March 17, 2004

Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 17:53
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 17:39
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg, 17:01
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 16:28
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:16
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick, 16:03
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg, 15:33
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, John C Klensin, 15:33
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick, 15:00
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, John C Klensin, 08:13
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:02

March 16, 2004

Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 20:04
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 19:39
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 19:04
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 18:38
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 18:22
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 18:12
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 18:10
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 17:59
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 17:56
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 17:49
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 17:33
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 17:23
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 17:19
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 17:12
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 17:09
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 17:05
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 16:59
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick, 16:27
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 15:33
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 15:22
Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick, 14:54