Re: Keep Alive Response Codes

I thought there was a common criteria for spam: it is unsolicited
mass-posting mail. Is that not an accepted definition?


Not so simple... For example, administrator notification about service 
inaccessibility will perfectly fit your criteria, but as for me is not a spam...

TBP

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, (continued) Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Vijayan Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Paul Smith Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Tony Finch Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, John Leslie Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Frank Ellermann Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Keld Jørn Simonsen Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Bogdan Tomchuk <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Keld Jørn Simonsen
Next by Date:	Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Keld Jørn Simonsen
Next by Thread:	Terminology: Administrative <?>, Dave Crocker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]