IETF SMTP (date)

September 23, 2005

Re: Terminology: Administrative <?>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:11

September 22, 2005

Re: Terminology: Administrative <?>, Dave Crocker, 14:57
Re: Terminology: Administrative <?>, Hector Santos, 09:42
Re: Terminology: Administrative <?>, Frank Ellermann, 04:03

September 21, 2005

Terminology: Administrative <?>, Dave Crocker, 22:29
Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Tony Finch, 06:59
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Lyndon Nerenberg, 01:15

September 20, 2005

Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Robert A. Rosenberg, 22:10

September 19, 2005

Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:37
Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Robert A. Rosenberg, 18:57
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, John Leslie, 10:08
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes [Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)], Tony Finch, 06:53
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes [Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)], Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:42
Re: Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Paul Smith, 03:21
Query Regarding SMTP Authentication, Vijayan, 02:54

September 17, 2005

Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith, 03:46
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Frank Ellermann, 03:42
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, John Leslie, 03:18
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith, 01:28

September 16, 2005

Re: Keep Alive Response Codes [Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)], Hector Santos, 22:48
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes [Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)], John C Klensin, 20:29
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, John C Klensin, 16:33
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Bogdan Tomchuk, 15:44
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 07:08
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith, 04:53
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Bogdan Tomchuk, 04:11

September 15, 2005

Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos, 15:36
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:35
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos, 09:59
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith, 09:33
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Tony Finch, 08:58
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Frank Ellermann, 08:58
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:32
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith, 08:13
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:32
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith, 06:31
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Bogdan Tomchuk, 06:20
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Tony Finch, 05:57
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:51
Re: slow email validation problems, John C Klensin, 05:12
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Paul Smith, 05:02
Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk, 05:01

September 14, 2005

Re: Keep Alive Response Codes, Frank Ellermann, 19:45
Re: slow email validation problems, Frank Ellermann, 19:06
Re: slow email validation problems, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:35
Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk, 14:27
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Bill McQuillan, 14:05
Re: slow email validation problems, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:09
Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk, 12:40
Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk, 12:32
Re: slow email validation problems, wayne, 12:01
Re: slow email validation problems, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:51
Re: slow email validation problems, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:43
Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk, 11:23
Re: slow email validation problems, wayne, 10:51
Re: slow email validation problems, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:46
Re: slow email validation problems, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:37
Re: slow email validation problems, wayne, 09:24
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 08:13
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 07:53
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Chris Haynes, 07:14
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:09
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:06
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 06:42
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 06:35
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos, 06:10
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 05:42
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:42
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:33
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos, 05:13
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos, 05:11
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes [Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)], Hector Santos, 05:11
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04:22
Re: Keep Alive Response Codes [Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)], Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:18
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:34
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:31
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 02:50
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:49
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 02:38
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 02:31
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:07
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos, 02:05
Keep Alive Response Codes [Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)], Hector Santos, 01:45
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:22

September 13, 2005

Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Frank Ellermann, 19:53
Re: reject vs bounce, Tony Finch, 04:21
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 03:42
Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos, 02:58
slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith, 02:23

September 12, 2005

Re: reject vs bounce, Frank Ellermann, 23:56
Re: "More-stuff" in Received fields, william(at)elan.net, 22:36
Re: reject vs bounce, Hector Santos, 21:43
Re: reject vs bounce, Frank Ellermann, 16:57
Re: "More Stuff" in Received header, Frank Ellermann, 14:39
Re: Changes in CWFS location in 2821bis ABNF, Tony Finch, 12:29
Re: Changes in CWFS location in 2821bis ABNF, John C Klensin, 11:50
Re: reject vs bounce, John C Klensin, 08:55
Re: "More Stuff" in Received header, Tony Finch, 04:39
Re: "More-stuff" in Received fields, John C Klensin, 04:36
Re: Changes in CWFS location in 2821bis ABNF (was: Re: Transparency), Tony Finch, 04:28
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Tony Finch, 04:07
Re: reject vs bounce, Frank Ellermann, 02:54
Re: 2822bis, Frank Ellermann, 01:20

September 11, 2005

Re: Transparency, Frank Ellermann, 23:36
Re: reject vs bounce, John C Klensin, 21:23
Re: 2822bis (was: Virtual last call on "bounce"), John C Klensin, 16:59
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", John C Klensin, 16:03
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Hector Santos, 12:04
Re: Transparency, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:49
Re: Transparency, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:37
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Hector Santos, 11:28
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Dave Crocker, 09:25
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:07
Re: "More-stuff" in Received fields, Frank Ellermann, 08:07
Re: Changes in CWFS location in 2821bis ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 07:51
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Frank Ellermann, 05:39
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:31
Re: Transparency, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:20
2822bis (was: Virtual last call on "bounce"), Frank Ellermann, 02:50
Re: Virtual last call on "bounce", Hector Santos, 01:31
Virtual last call on "bounce", John C Klensin, 00:27
Changes in CWFS location in 2821bis ABNF (was: Re: Transparency), John C Klensin, 00:20

September 10, 2005

"More-stuff" in Received fields (was: Re: Transparency), John C Klensin, 23:57
Re: Transparency, John C Klensin, 23:35
Re: reject vs bounce, Frank Ellermann, 21:25
Re: Transparency, Frank Ellermann, 20:55
"More Stuff" in Received header, John Leslie, 19:52
Re: Transparency, John C Klensin, 18:23
Re: reject vs bounce, william(at)elan.net, 04:00
Re: reject vs bounce, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:46
Re: reject vs bounce, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:43
Re: reject vs bounce, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:01
Re: Transparency, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:19
Re: reject vs bounce, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:19

September 09, 2005

Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 22:47
Re: Transparency, Valdis . Kletnieks, 19:26
Re: Transparency, Frank Ellermann, 17:48
Re: reject vs bounce, Frank Ellermann, 15:44
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Frank Ellermann, 15:19
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:59
Re: reject vs bounce, Tony Finch, 06:19
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Tony Finch, 06:17
[john Re: comments on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-00], Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:00
Re: Transparency, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 01:48

September 08, 2005

Re: reject vs bounce, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:51
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Frank Ellermann, 19:51
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:45
Re: reject vs bounce, Hector Santos, 19:02
Re: reject vs bounce, Tony Finch, 18:32
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Tony Finch, 18:15
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:34
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Frank Ellermann, 17:34
reject vs bounce, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:14
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Frank Ellermann, 17:04
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Kai Henningsen, 16:48
Re: Transparency, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:08
Re: EHLO/HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:56
Re: Transparency, Frank Ellermann, 15:35
Re: EHLO/HELO, Frank Ellermann, 15:27
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Frank Ellermann, 15:18
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Chris Haynes, 12:44
Re: trace header fields, was Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 11:55
Re: Transparency, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:41
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Tony Finch, 10:47
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John Leslie, 10:22
Re: Transparency, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:00
trace header fields, was Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Tony Finch, 09:56
Re: EHLO/HELO, John Leslie, 09:51
Re: Transparency, Paul Smith, 09:41
Re: Transparency, John Leslie, 09:35
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 09:21
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 09:16
EHLO/HELO, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:43
Transparency, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:43
Hello, new user, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:43
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Tony Finch, 08:11
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 07:55
message data terminology, was Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Tony Finch, 07:41
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 07:31
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Robert A. Rosenberg, 01:58
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Valdis . Kletnieks, 01:58

September 07, 2005

Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 23:38
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Chris Haynes, 23:21
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, Chris Haynes, 23:10
Re: Classifying gateways in 2821/ 2821bis, John C Klensin, 22:48

September 05, 2005

Re: 2821bis chapter 2, Tony Finch, 07:00
Re: 2821bis ABNF diff, Tony Finch, 06:39
Re: 2821bis vs rfc2119, Frank Ellermann, 03:08
Re: 2821bis vs rfc2119, wayne, 01:36

September 03, 2005

Re: Resent-* oddities, Frank Ellermann, 22:40
Re: 2821bis chapter 2, John C Klensin, 16:12
Re: 2821bis chapter 2, Frank Ellermann, 14:49
Re: 2821bis chapter 2, John Leslie, 11:22
Re: RFC *821: failure versus error, Bruce Lilly, 10:20
Re: 2821bis chapter 2, John Leslie, 09:24
Re: 2821bis chapter 2, John C Klensin, 09:01

September 02, 2005

2821bis ABNF diff, Frank Ellermann, 16:06
2821bis chapter 2, Frank Ellermann, 16:06
Re: RFC *821: failure versus error, John C Klensin, 12:58
Re: RFC *821: failure versus error, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:32
RFC *821: failure versus error, Claus Assmann, 09:30

September 01, 2005

Re: RFC 3207 (STARTTLS) question, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:38
Re: RFC 3207 (STARTTLS) question, thomas schorpp, 02:36
Re: RFC 3207 (STARTTLS) question, thomas schorpp, 02:06
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of, thomas schorpp, 00:42
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of, thomas schorpp, 00:35
Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, thomas schorpp, 00:35