[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Virtual last call on "bounce"

2005-09-11 08:07:56

On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:

Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:

c) use it to describe reject (5xx) only, as it was in 821

That's not the case (I'm a bit pissed that Hector apparently
ignored _all_ articles about this issue in a separate thread)

Ack.  I must have been confused between 821 and 2821 myself.  Sorry.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>