Hi.
The wind seems to be blowing in the direction of removing the
term "bounce" from 2821bis. Different people have different
reasons, but I don't think I've detected anyone who has claimed
that there is value in leaving it in.
If I don't hear a coherent argument for retaining it within the
next few days, it will be removed from 2821bis-01.
For planning purposes, I'm incorporating changes in the working
copy of -01 as agreement seems to be reached on them. I'll
actually post -01 when
* enough substantive changes have been made that it
feels worthwhile (with editorial changes not counting
unless there are very many of them) or
* I start seeing "deadline approaching" notes from the
Secretariat or
* Pete or one of the ADs asks me to.
"Enough", in that first option is extremely subjective and will
be determined exclusively by me, although I'm open to persuasion
and/or bribery. I am somewhat disinclined to get 2821bis-02, or
even 2821bis-01, posted before 2822bis-00 appears, so people who
would like to see faster turnover on 2821bis drafts should be
pinging Pete.
john