Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)
2005-09-14 02:07:45
If anyone is thinking of doing that sort of thing, I would recommend
putting a fast host in front of the slow one. We do that at work, and
it works well.
Our fast host rejects most spam, quickly about it, and forwards mail
locally via LMTP. The LMTP server may take an awfully long time to
accept mail, but that isn't a problem, because we've configured its
only client to be generous about timeouts.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: slow email validation problems, (continued)
- Re: slow email validation problems, Frank Ellermann
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Tony Finch
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce),
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Alex van den Bogaerdt
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith
- Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
|
|
|