Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:42:07 EDT, Hector Santos said:

1) Clarify intermediate REPLY codes [SHOULD?/MUST?] be persistent with
   the final REPLY code.  See paragraph in question about ignoring all
   continuation lines.


Did you mean "persistent" or "consistent"?

pgpbK0Gu4mfyO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: slow email validation problems, (continued) Re: slow email validation problems, Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk Re: slow email validation problems, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk Re: slow email validation problems, John C Klensin Re: slow email validation problems, wayne Re: slow email validation problems, Bogdan Tomchuk Re: slow email validation problems, Frank Ellermann Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Tony Finch Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Valdis . Kletnieks <= Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Hector Santos Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Paul Smith Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce), Harald Tveit Alvestrand