----- Original Message -----
From: <Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
Cc: "Tony Finch" <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>; "Paul Smith"
<paul(_at_)pscs(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>; "Frank
Ellermann" <nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de>;
<ietf-smtp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: slow email validation problems (was reject vs bounce)
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:42:07 EDT, Hector Santos said:
1) Clarify intermediate REPLY codes [SHOULD?/MUST?] be persistent with
the final REPLY code. See paragraph in question about ignoring all
continuation lines.
Did you mean "persistent" or "consistent"?
Oy vey.
I meant persistent (continued) usage of same reply code (meaning retaining
the same value for each line) and I guess, to make sure it is "consistent"
with the final reply code. Maybe a better word to use is "match?"
Immediate reply codes [SHOULD?/MUST?] match the final reply code.
Maybe someone else can reword the above.
Anyway, I'm sure John will get it right. :-)
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com