Re: reject vs bounce

Frank Ellermann writes:
> Tony Finch wrote:
>
> >  2821 uses "bounce" informally but doesn't define it or the word "reject".
> Do we at least have "consensus" that the informal usage of "bounce" in 
> 2821 does not reflect what most users consider as "bounce",
No. Mutt and elm users think that, but AFAICT other MUA users don't.

> and in 2821bis we'd be better off if we use only "reject" or "NDN" ?
Perhaps, but you need other arguments.

Arnt