Mark,
thanks for the comments.
responses on the items needing one:
Mark E. Mallett wrote:
Looks pretty nice. Some very small stuff (against the -07 version on
ietf.org, which I would assume is the same):
yes.
====================
Change notes say that "Bounce" has been moved out of the MHS (diagram),
and so it is; but there is an MHS Actors subsection (2.2.2) for Bounce
Handler, implying that Bounce Handler is inside the MHS. This is
confusing.
Oh. Right. Hmmm.
I've been so hung up on emphasizing that the address is set by the
rfc2822.sender (Source) addressee that I forgot to follow through on the
implication that it really is an MUA address.
I propose to move all Bounce description to be in the MUA, unless folks think
that is a problem. For me, the deciding factor, is that the use of the
address does deliver to an MUA.
4.1.4. Identity References in a Message
This section ends with subsections for "List-ID" and "List-*" which are
not included in the table at the beginning of the section. Is this
intentional? Relatedly, "IP Address" appears in the table but has
no subsection.
No, so thanks for catching it. I moved stuff around quite a bit, so it's not
surprising that there are some inconsistencies. John Leslie also noted that
ENVID got inconsistent treatment. The next version fixes that.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net