Just excude "obs" ? [was: Closing out all other issues in draft-klensin-2821bis}2008-02-16 04:29:08Various 2822upd details were modified in the last six weeks, e.g., 2821bis now needs its own <dcontent> excluding "obs". Maybe it's more straight forward if all 2822upd imports just exclude "obs" constructs (same idea as in RFC.usefor-usefor). With that strategy some of the proposed new <xyzSMTP> terms might be unnecessary. However this needs a MUST somewhere, a good place could be where CTL is already noted as MUST NOT. Frank
|
|