Re: Closing out all other issues in draft-klensin-2821bis

Hi,

Tony Hansen wrote:
> This message finishes the list of other issues with 
> draft-klensin-2821bis or bugs that were found during the last call, and 
> their disposition if consensus was gained.
I've posted a few messages about section 3.9. I understand I should have 
posted that 4 or 5 years ago, but I only joined this list last Jan 16th. 
Thus, if at all possible, I'd ask if some cleanup can be considered before 
the text is standardized.
Section 3.9.2 "List" is different in rfc2821bis-0N (0N>= 03) w.r.t the 
current rfc2821. The added final note, distinguishing alias expansion and 
forwarding, would be correct if that subsection were named "Forwarding".
Because the surrounding text specifically describes mailing lists, it may 
instead convey the wrong impression that the envelope sender address 
should be changed in that case _only_. (Of course, the envelope sender MAY 
be changed when privacy or policy concerns require it, according to 
section 4.4.)
I apologize for my scarce knowledge of standardization processes; that 
notwithstanding, I hope the IETF will release a coherent standard.
Ale