IETF SMTP (thread)
Closing out the comments,
Tony Hansen,
2008/02/12
- rfc2821bis-07 (was: Re: Closing out the comments), John C Klensin, 2008/02/19
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Tony Hansen, 2008/02/20
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Derek J. Balling, 2008/02/20
- Re: rfc2821bis-07 (and -08), John C Klensin, 2008/02/20
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Alessandro Vesely, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Tony Hansen, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Derek J. Balling, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Hector Santos, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, John C Klensin, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Hector Santos, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, John C Klensin, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Hector Santos, 2008/02/21
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, John Leslie, 2008/02/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, John C Klensin, 2008/02/22
- MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821 (was: rfc2821bis-07), Frank Ellermann, 2008/02/22
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821 (was: rfc2821bis-07), John C Klensin, 2008/02/22
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, Alessandro Vesely, 2008/02/23
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, SM, 2008/02/23
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, Alessandro Vesely, 2008/02/24
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, Hector Santos, 2008/02/24
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, John C Klensin, 2008/02/24
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, ned+ietf-smtp, 2008/02/24
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, Derek J. Balling, 2008/02/24
- The "such responses" extension sentence (was: Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821), John C Klensin, 2008/02/24
- Re: The "such responses" extension sentence, Frank Ellermann, 2008/02/24
- Re: The "such responses" extension sentence, Dave Crocker, 2008/02/24
- Re: The "such responses" extension sentence (was: Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821), SM, 2008/02/25
- Re: The "such responses" extension sentence (was: Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821), Mark Martinec, 2008/02/25
- RE: The "such responses" extension sentence (was: Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821), Trevor Paquette, 2008/02/29
- Re: The "such responses" extension sentence (was: Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821), John Leslie, 2008/02/25
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, Alessandro Vesely, 2008/02/25
- Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821, SM, 2008/02/24
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, ned+ietf-smtp, 2008/02/24
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, SM, 2008/02/20
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, John C Klensin, 2008/02/20
- Re: rfc2821bis-07, Frank Ellermann, 2008/02/21