[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay

2010-08-11 12:24:22

Hi Tony,
At 09:19 11-08-10, Tony Hansen wrote:
I'm wondering if, instead of changing the 5321 guidance, there needs to be text added to 4409bis about timeouts being shorter than those normally used by SMTP.

I vague recall that the question of timeouts came up during a discussion about 4409bis.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>