From: Pete Resnick [mailto:presnick(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:13 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Subject: Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp
(a) This shouldn't be labeled as a BCP. It's an A/S Standards Track
draft if ever there was one.
I guess I'm still unclear on the difference. I'm fine with either status,
especially if someone can point me at a good definition so I understand why
one's better than the other.
(b) Given this and the extension, is it worth spinning up a Greylisting WG?
IMHO, there's not enough support for the extension as a Standards Track item.
I imagine if there's a group that wants to pursue an Experimental one, that
could happen through the ISE.
Given that, I (respectfully!) suggest this could be handled by APPSAWG. I've
already requested a slot for it in Taipei.