[Top] [All Lists]

RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp

2011-10-26 02:46:01

-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Resnick [mailto:presnick(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:13 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf-smtp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp

(a) This shouldn't be labeled as a BCP. It's an A/S Standards Track
draft if ever there was one.

I guess I'm still unclear on the difference.  I'm fine with either status, 
especially if someone can point me at a good definition so I understand why 
one's better than the other.

(b) Given this and the extension, is it worth spinning up a Greylisting WG?

IMHO, there's not enough support for the extension as a Standards Track item.  
I imagine if there's a group that wants to pursue an Experimental one, that 
could happen through the ISE.

Given that, I (respectfully!) suggest this could be handled by APPSAWG.  I've 
already requested a slot for it in Taipei.