IETF SMTP (date)
October 31, 2011
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Mark Andrews, 22:14
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis, 21:27
- RE: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:37
- Re: retrying very often (was: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control), Claus Assmann, 11:43
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 11:33
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch, 11:31
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 11:18
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch, 11:09
October 30, 2011
- Re: Putting it all together, Hector Santos, 16:55
- Re: Per-session SMTP extensions, Hector Santos, 16:21
- Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Peter J. Holzer, 13:53
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Robert A. Rosenberg, 13:12
- Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Robert A. Rosenberg, 13:12
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 11:08
- Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), John C Klensin, 08:57
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 08:55
- Re: Putting it all together, Frank Ellermann, 07:23
- Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Peter J. Holzer, 05:24
- Re: Putting it all together, Hector Santos, 05:23
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 04:39
- Re: Putting it all together, Paul Smith, 03:53
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Paul Smith, 03:45
October 29, 2011
- Putting it all together, Hector Santos, 23:12
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos, 22:41
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg, 22:11
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Robert A. Rosenberg, 22:10
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 20:45
- Re: SMTP traffic control, John C Klensin, 20:44
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Russ Allbery, 19:21
- Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), John C Klensin, 19:08
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 18:16
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 16:49
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 15:25
- Proposal: SMTP Ext - Base protocol for structured responses, Hector Santos, 15:11
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 13:34
- Re: SMTP traffic control, John C Klensin, 13:34
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 13:09
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 12:51
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 12:42
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 12:37
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 12:31
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer, 12:30
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10:42
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos, 09:43
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Peter J. Holzer, 08:16
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER, 08:14
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:57
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 07:54
- Re: SMTP traffic control, SM, 04:51
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 04:42
- RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy, 04:34
- RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, SM, 04:32
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Paul Smith, 04:22
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Paul Smith, 04:21
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 03:56
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 03:25
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 03:16
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Peter J. Holzer, 03:04
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 02:55
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer, 02:50
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Carl S. Gutekunst, 02:10
- RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:06
- RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:40
- RE: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:26
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:23
October 28, 2011
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos, 23:43
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Carl S. Gutekunst, 23:34
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 22:47
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Steve Atkins, 21:40
- Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 21:23
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 21:17
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 20:30
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins, 20:24
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos, 19:55
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 19:37
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos, 19:26
- Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos, 19:15
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Douglas Otis, 18:39
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Tim Kehres, 18:09
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg, 16:39
- draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 16:31
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins, 16:17
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 16:13
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 16:00
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 15:57
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins, 15:53
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 14:42
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 14:23
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 08:49
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos, 06:18
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tony Finch, 05:40
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos, 03:15
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tony Finch, 02:48
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 01:52
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 01:39
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Robert A. Rosenberg, 01:14
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 01:07
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 00:26
October 27, 2011
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 23:46
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, SM, 20:53
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 18:41
- Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 17:26
- 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 16:14
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 15:27
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos, 15:19
- Re: Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), Richard Kulawiec, 11:59
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 11:56
- RE: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:10
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 00:08
October 26, 2011
- RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:53
- RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:51
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector, 22:03
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Hector, 12:48
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector, 12:18
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Keith Moore, 12:05
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 11:29
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Paul Smith, 11:12
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Keith Moore, 10:59
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Steve Atkins, 10:58
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, John C Klensin, 10:55
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10:53
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Tim Kehres, 10:50
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Dave CROCKER, 10:48
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10:46
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tim Kehres, 10:46
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, John C Klensin, 10:35
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10:34
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10:20
- Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tim Kehres, 10:04
- new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector, 09:20
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Keith Moore, 07:27
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 03:41
- RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:46
October 25, 2011
- retry=min/max syntax, Hector, 19:01
- retry=min-max [was Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting], Hector, 15:03
- Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann, 13:56
- Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 13:44
- Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann, 13:38
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 13:32
- Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 12:40
- Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 12:27
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 12:05
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., John C Klensin, 11:22
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 11:21
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10:43
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Hector, 10:12
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Hector, 09:45
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Keith Moore, 08:41
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 07:16
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Rolf E. Sonneveld, 06:19
- Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann, 05:50
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., SM, 05:26
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Frank Ellermann, 05:02
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 04:57
- Re: retry=, Frank Ellermann, 04:49
- RE: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Murray S. Kucherawy, 04:47
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 04:33
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Paul Smith, 04:11
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 03:47
- RE: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Murray S. Kucherawy, 03:24
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 03:23
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 02:28
- Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Carl S. Gutekunst, 02:22
- Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 02:13
October 24, 2011
- Re: retry=, Hector, 21:57
- Re: retry=, Hector, 21:05
- Re: retry=delay, Hector, 20:27
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 19:43
- Re: retry= (was: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting), Claus Assmann, 19:35
- Re: retry=delay (was: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting), Claus Assmann, 19:30
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 19:15
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 19:02
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 18:57
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 18:51
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 17:57
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 17:55
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 17:54
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 17:23
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 17:14
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 16:22
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 16:20
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 14:11
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 13:55
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 12:53
- RE: SMTP traffic control, ned+ietf-smtp, 12:40
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 11:26
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 10:36
- RE: SMTP traffic control, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 10:06
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 10:03
- Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 09:48
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 09:42
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 09:00
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 08:59
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 08:19
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07:13
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 06:32
- I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 01:34
October 19, 2011
- Re: Trusted agency, SM, 17:51
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 16:43
- Re: Trusted agency, Douglas Otis, 16:02
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis, 15:42
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 09:47
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Derek J. Balling, 09:35
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 09:22
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 09:21
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 09:18
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 09:08
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Frank Ellermann, 08:05
- Re: Trusted agency, SM, 00:48
- Re: Trusted agency, Douglas Otis, 00:11
October 18, 2011
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:42
- Re: Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), John Leslie, 11:16
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:44
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:02
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 06:22
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 05:08
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres, 04:25
- Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), SM, 02:37
October 17, 2011
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis, 22:11
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 17:15
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 17:01
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:33
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 14:02
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:38
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:21
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 13:16
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 13:00
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 12:50
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 12:43
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 12:18
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 12:09
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 11:49
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 11:40
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:58
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:53
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 09:06
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER, 09:03
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John C Klensin, 07:03
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 07:03
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:17
October 13, 2011
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 22:23
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Douglas Otis, 20:22
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 19:22
- Re: SMTP traffic control, SM, 17:50
- RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:44
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 17:30
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER, 16:53
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 16:45
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 12:35
- Re: SMTP traffic control (was Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 12:20
- SMTP traffic control (was Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 10:14
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 10:07
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 03:55
October 12, 2011
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 23:29
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 22:13
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, ned+ietf-smtp, 18:57
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 17:15
- Re: Mailing lists and GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 14:36
- Mailing lists and GREY LISTING, Дилян Палаузов, 14:22
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 13:40
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 13:30
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 13:23
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 13:03
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:51
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:38
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:31
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 08:43
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 08:21
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:20
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 08:02
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:48
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Robert A. Rosenberg, 07:29
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 03:20
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, ned+ietf-smtp, 00:37
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres, 00:11
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:02
October 11, 2011
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 23:33
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 23:32
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 19:45
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis, 15:00
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 13:51
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:39
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 13:37
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 13:32
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:32
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:17
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 13:17
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 12:57
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:49
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:46
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 11:59
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10:53
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:45
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 09:11
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres, 09:06
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 09:02
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 08:35
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 08:21
- RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 08:21
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 07:54
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 07:21
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 07:20
- Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 07:17
- We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 06:58
October 06, 2011
- How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 19:54
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Dave CROCKER, 19:54
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Dave CROCKER, 19:53
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, John Levine, 19:41
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Douglas Otis, 14:43
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Derek J. Balling, 09:03
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 09:00
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Derek J. Balling, 08:56
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 08:41
- RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rosenwald, Jordan, 08:18
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 07:47
- RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael, 07:14
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Hector, 01:26
October 05, 2011
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Paul Smith, 21:06
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Douglas Otis, 19:09
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Carl S. Gutekunst, 14:00
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 13:34
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 13:32
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Alessandro Vesely, 13:00
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 12:53
- RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael, 12:33
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 11:36
- RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael, 10:43
- RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Tony Finch, 10:23
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 09:46
- RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Murray S. Kucherawy, 09:35
- RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rosenwald, Jordan, 08:53
- Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Valdis . Kletnieks, 00:16