Re: SMTP traffic control



On Oct 24, 2011, at 1:23 PM, ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:

Personally I think this is a solution looking for a problem.


+1

                              Ned


+1  

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: SMTP traffic control, (continued) RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith RE: SMTP traffic control, MH Michael Hammer (5304) RE: SMTP traffic control, ned+ietf-smtp Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore <= Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer Re: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan

Previous by Date:	RE: SMTP traffic control, ned+ietf-smtp
Next by Date:	Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
Previous by Thread:	RE: SMTP traffic control, ned+ietf-smtp
Next by Thread:	Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]