[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SMTP traffic control

2011-10-28 16:13:46

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011, Carl S. Gutekunst wrote:
Steve Atkins wrote:

That's the end-user visible part of the thought behind anyway.

I'd support that proposal. I might even implement it.

Yes, we should use this as basis for further discussion.  I would
like to see this extended by more explanations of temporary failures
beyond "wait", e.g., session and transaction limits (see an earlier
mail from me in this subthread).

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>