Re: SMTP traffic control

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011, Carl S. Gutekunst wrote:
> Steve Atkins wrote:
> > That's the end-user visible part of the thought behind 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control/ anyway.
> I'd support that proposal. I might even implement it.
Yes, we should use this as basis for further discussion.  I would
like to see this extended by more explanations of temporary failures
beyond "wait", e.g., session and transaction limits (see an earlier
mail from me in this subthread).