Re: SMTP traffic control
2011-10-28 19:37:30
Hector Santos wrote:
Unfortunately, the dominant conversation seems to be around an SMTP
response that only applies to greylisting. I'd never use that or
support it, it's such a teeny-tiny corner case, especially in the
B-to-B world where I live.
Does this suggests that your B2B market is oblivious to the outside
world remote server behaviors employing 4yz temporary rejections?
They're highly conscious of 4xx temporary rejections associated with
resource exhaustion and down systems. But in 20 years of supporting
B-to-B E-mail, I can only remember one issue with someone else's
greylisting -- and that was because it was broken.
<csg>
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: SMTP traffic control, (continued)
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Tim Kehres
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos
- Re: SMTP traffic control,
Carl S. Gutekunst <=
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins
- Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst
- Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Steve Atkins
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Carl S. Gutekunst
|
|
|