[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=)

2011-10-29 02:50:19
On 2011-10-28 23:33:09 -0400, Hector Santos wrote:
But I am sure there would be a concern with a no enforcement model in  
the open market since the tendency will be "why bother?" Even within the 
Honor System, good intention clients who feel they must get a message 
delivered, or simply has no incentive to bother with code changes, will 
cross their fingers and just retry again. After all, the new please 
"wait=" idea is for the *other guy" and not them.

For good guys the reason to bother is that they will usually get the
mail through *faster*, because the wait time announced by the server is
*less* than their usual retry time.


   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | Web 2.0 könnte man also auch übersetzen als
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR       | "Netz der kleinen Geister".
| |   | hjp(_at_)hjp(_dot_)at         | 
__/   | |  -- Oliver Cromm in desd

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>