Steve Atkins wrote:
My point is if like Atkins proposal and might implement it, once you do,
you will be behaving like a Greylisted server.
That's simply not true. Please stop stating that.
Are you saying your proposal offer a server issuing of a "wait=" time
with no server tracking and enforcement?
Its not be meant to be a negative and it doesn't help with ongoing
attempts to create division.
Any proposal that includes a "time delay" for a client to use, and
more importantly the server will enforce, is 100% *behaving* (keyword)
like a Greylisting Server model. I can't see how you can avoid it.
The client is doing this blinding. If it encounters a server with
this "wait=" in a 4yz response, its going to have the same MTA
software rescheduling code for supporting any other kind a "retry=" or
parsing of the informal existing greylisting servers with their time
hints.
So unless the proposal is not offering server enforcement, it is very
much a Greylisting Model.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com