Re: SMTP traffic control

On 2011-10-28 13:49:49 -0700, Carl S. Gutekunst wrote:
> > That's the end-user visible part of the thought behind
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control/
> > anyway.
> >   
> I'd support that proposal. I might even implement it.
>
> Unfortunately, the dominant conversation seems to be around an SMTP
> response that only applies to greylisting.
Probably because excessive delays due to 4xx errors are most visible or
at least most annoying (the server could accept the mail, but it doesn't
want to!) with greylisting.

        hp

-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | Web 2.0 könnte man also auch übersetzen als
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR       | "Netz der kleinen Geister".
| |   | hjp(_at_)hjp(_dot_)at         | 
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |  -- Oliver Cromm in desd

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature