[Top] [All Lists]

Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp

2011-10-25 12:27:07

(a) This shouldn't be labeled as a BCP. It's an A/S Standards Track draft if ever there was one.
(b) Given this and the extension, is it worth spinning up a Greylisting WG?


On 10/23/11 3:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Maybe a new thread Subject: would help here...

Given the interest, I've started putting together a BCP.  It's now posted as 
draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp; comments welcome (and thanks to those of you 
that already did).  It is only an outline right now, and I'll fill it in as 
people make suggestions about topics it should cover and/or start providing 
text to include.

It doesn't touch the SMTP extension people are discussing.  Someone else can 
champion that one if so inclined.  That shouldn't go in a BCP because it 
doesn't even exist yet.  This document will only describe current and historic 

Maybe we can get it on the docket for Taipei.  I'll send out some friendly 


Pete Resnick<>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102