I actually started writing such a doc about a year ago, but never
Is it worth dusting off?
On 2/28/2012 12:24 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/28/2012 9:11 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
OK, I was wrong - but I've never seen a BCC handled in that way
sometimes received messages with a 'BCC' field containing addresses
who were NOT
me (ie I shouldn't have known they existed), and most MUAs I've seen
all those I've investigated fully) just list those recipients in the
for a single copy of the message. So, I've never seen a BCC field in
header, used 'correctly'.
We have never really standardized BCC as an end-to-end construct, at
the MUA-MUA level.