Hi Dave,
At 06:59 21-07-2014, Dave Crocker wrote:
Really???
Yes.
The sentence is factually incorrect, about basic matters of SPF and
DKIM, and these matters are commonly misrepresented and understood.
In other words, the fact that an IETF standards track document is
mischaracterizing important bits of technology is problematic to a
meaningful level.
It is one sentence and it starts with "Recent work" and provides two
Informative references. There were significant issues with those
bits of technologies. RFC 5321 does not say anything about that.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp