[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] [Shutup] Proposed Charter for the "SMTP Headers Unhealthy To User Privacy" WG (fwd)

2015-12-01 10:55:11
Tuesday, Dec 1, 2015 7:27 AM Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Sure, but in this case wouldn't deferring to the end systems> argue in favor 
of allowing end systems to make the decision as> to whether their private 
information should be exposed?

As I see it, that's not the question here. The question is: Should there be 
an RFC that can be used/misused to apply pressure regarding trace fields etc?

Yes, I agree that this is what we are discussing.   I think it's pretty clear 
that for Received header fields that refer to the IP address of the end-user, 
the answer is "yes, there should be such an RFC."   I haven't heard anyone 
seriously propose that this is not true, although I'd be interested to hear 
such an argument!

Sent from Whiteout Mail -

My PGP key:

Attachment: pgpRkDqfOET2G.pgp
Description: PGP signature

ietf-smtp mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>