On 10/27/19 3:58 PM, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
If random 4xx on MAIL as penalty for not offering reasonable TLS will help make
things better, will random mail
segmentation as penalty for senders not supporting PRDR, convince anybody to
implement PRDR?
I don't think they're going to be well-correlated, because the benefits
from encrypting mail transport and the benefits from optimizing mail
error reporting are different. They benefit different parties, and the
perceived importance of encryption is different than the perceived
importance of optimizing mail error reporting.
I support the idea behind PRDR and am not aware of any drawbacks to
implementing it. In general my observation is that the earlier mail
transmission errors are caught and reported, the more reliable the
reporting is; and the overall reliability of email improves by improving
error reporting.
Keith
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp