Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum length
2019-11-29 20:01:10On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 11:16:39 -0600, "Pete Resnick" said:
There were less than a dozen errata against 5322 that could be trivially fixed. I fixed them as part of my conversion.
How large is the pile of errata that are non-trivial fixes?
pgp_lCzO6ezPI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum length, John C Klensin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum length, John C Klensin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum length, John C Klensin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum length, John C Klensin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |